Tag: late autism diagnosis

The Silence Between Knowing and Writing: What Happened After My Late Autism Diagnosis

For five months after my diagnosis, I could not write. The cursor blinked on a blank draft, waiting. I sat at my desk in the bedroom most mornings, after the children had left for school and the laundry was folded and the plants were watered and I had been to the gym and come home and showered.

I’m ready to write.

Not really.

I had things to say. I had so many things to say that I could not bring any of them into focus.

I had been squinting my whole life. I did not know this until someone handed me the right lenses.

Before the diagnosis, the blur was all I knew. I leaned closer. I worked harder. I memorised what I could not quite make out and performed the rest from context. I built workarounds so thorough that nobody, not even me, suspected I could not see properly. I thought the effort was normal. I thought everyone squinted like this.

Podcasts were part of the squinting. I kept them on constantly — while cooking, cleaning, exercising, folding laundry. Always learning something. Always filling the quiet with something productive, because silence felt like wasted time, and rest felt like falling behind. I did not understand, then, that the compulsion to be always learning, always improving, always sharpening my focus was itself a kind of strain. I thought it was discipline.

It was compensation.

The diagnosis handed me the right prescription. The world came into focus. And it was unbearable.

Not because the world was ugly. It was simply too sharp. Too much detail, arriving all at once. Every memory I had squinted through, suddenly relit in high definition. Every friendship I had worked hard to maintain, every job that had cost me more than it should have, every morning I had woken up exhausted and told myself it was a character flaw. I could see now. I could also see everything I had missed. Everything behind me was suddenly, painfully clear. Everything ahead of me was not.

I closed my eyes.

Not literally. But something in me shut down the part that was trying to see.

I stopped.

Not visibly. Visibly, I kept going. I made breakfast. I packed bags. I did school runs. I watered the plants. I answered the texts that needed answering. But the part of me that made meaning of things on the page — the part that tried to bring my own life into focus and hold it still long enough to describe — that part went somewhere I could not reach.

I was not blocked. I was vacant.

There was a constant buzz in my head during those months. Noisy but empty. So many thoughts that I could not make proper sense of any of them — they went in circles and loops and knots, and whenever I reached for one, it slipped out from under another.

Silence became too loud. Podcasts became too noisy. Someone else’s clarity aimed straight at a head that could no longer hold it. I could not find a setting that fit.

So I blasted music instead. Sad, dramatic music that seemed to be singing the story of my life — my woes and my worries and my wishes and my hopes, all of them on repeat, loud enough to fill the entire house. It felt frivolous. It was not productive. It was not improving me. But it was the first time I had let myself stop squinting and simply close my eyes. The music did not explain anything. It did not teach me anything. It just sat with me, in the mess of what I was feeling, without trying to resolve it.

Nothing made sense.

And then the body took over.

I started running. I had never been a runner. I am still not, really — but during those months I laced up almost every day, and I did not stop even when I should have. I ran until my knees hurt and my toenail fell off, and then I ran again. It was not training. It was not self-care. It was flight. Running is what the body does when it cannot bear to look.

What I was running from, I could not have told you at the time. I only knew that the noise in my head quietened slightly when my body was moving. Not the thoughts, those kept looping, but the pressure underneath the thoughts, the hum that was always there. Running turned it down a few notches. That was enough.

My body kept paying. The knees. The toenail. The mornings I could barely get out of bed. I went back anyway. I could see that I was injuring myself. I could not stop.

I think it was my body trying to process what the mind could not. I did not know it at the time. I only knew I had to move and that I couldn’t be still.

I was depressed.

I want to name it properly, because the word gets softened too easily in writing like this. Not a hard time. Not a fog. Not a difficult season. Depression — low, sustained, unmistakable, even if it never tipped into the acute shapes I had been trained to recognise.

This is what nobody tells you about the new clarity: it does not feel like liberation. It feels like the exhaustion of having squinted for forty years catching up with you all at once. All that effort. All those years of straining to bring a picture into focus that was never going to resolve, because the problem was never effort. And now that you know, the straining makes no sense, and neither does the life you built on top of it.

I was still functioning. Everything looked fine. I want to say this because it matters for anyone reading who is wondering whether what they are carrying counts: depression can look like someone who still makes breakfast. It can look like someone who still gets to the gym. It can look like someone whose house is still clean and whose children still have their bags packed and whose plants are still watered.

There was an image going around at the time, of a mother so drained that she had died. After she died, she got up to make dinner. I thought about that one a lot. I cannot afford to die. That was the engine my nervous system was running on. Not aliveness. Just the refusal to stop moving.

A thought came clearly during those months, more than once.

I do not want to die. I also do not feel like I’m living.

Those are two different things. I did not know they could sit in the same body at the same time until they did.

Here is the part that is hardest to write. I will write it because I said I would be honest.

There came a point when I needed to feel pain, just to feel something. I remembered thinking: I understand now why people cut themselves. I am a clinician. I had read the literature. I had never, in all my years with patients, really understood that sentence the way I understood it in my own head. Pain as proof of aliveness. Pain as the only signal sharp enough to cut through the blur.

I did not cut myself. I had used pain before, a long time ago, during a different grief. I know this pattern in my body. This time, I went and got my ears pierced. Two pairs of new holes. One set for the autism. One set for the giftedness. Pain as a reminder to wake up and to move on.

Looking back, part of me wants to call it silly. Childish. Something I should be embarrassed by. But it was not silly at the time. It was the most practical thing I could think of. A legitimate way to feel pain, to feel alive.

I am including this because nobody writes about it. The wellness internet will tell you to journal and drink more water. The research will tell you that late-diagnosed autistic adults are five times more likely to attempt suicide and leave it there. Between those two registers there is a whole territory — the pain-seeking, the not-wanting-to-be-alive-without-being-suicidal, the peculiar logic of needing a sharp sensation when the rest of your life has gone to blur.

This was mine.

I started doing calligraphy during those months. I bought a blank book, no lines, no structure, and a calligraphy pen. I sat at a desk in the quiet hours and copied out sentences by hand, slowly.

One of the first phrases I wrote was this.

One of the kindest things you can do is to be gentle and patient with yourself.

I had been gentle with my patients. I had been gentle with my children, on my best days. I had spent over a decade learning how to sit with people who were reckoning with the gap between the life they had imagined and the life they were living — and how to stay gentle while I did it.

I had never been gentle with myself. Not really. I had spent all those years squinting and calling it discipline.

That was not a turning point. Nothing turned. I wrote the sentence, and then I wrote other sentences. Every morning, I was still flat and my knees still hurt and the cursor on the WordPress draft was still blinking at me. One calligraphy line does not lift a depression.

But the pen had moved. The hand had moved. Something in me had moved something in the world, in ink. Not in focus — not yet. But in motion. It was small. It counted.

I came back to the blog in April. Not because I had resolved anything. Not because I had found my purpose, or my voice, or my way through. I came back because the thing inside me had to go somewhere.

The cursor was still blinking. It had waited. I put one word down. Then another. The picture was not sharp — it was not going to be sharp for a long time, maybe not ever in the way I used to think sharp meant. But I could make out shapes. I could see enough to begin.

The piece that came out was not the one I had been trying to write for five months. It was something else — less resolved, more honest about not being on the other side of anything. Written not with the old squint but with the new, imperfect, too-bright way of seeing.

The post you are reading now is what I did not know how to write at the time. I am writing it from a place that is not fully healed and not fully finished, because the silence was part of the story, and the story does not make sense without it.

I am still learning how to see. The blur is not gone. But I have stopped squinting.

If anything in this piece has landed on something tender in your own life, please reach out to someone — a person, a helpline, a trained professional. This post is memoir, not a prescription. What worked inside my own silence is not a map for yours. But you do not have to be inside it alone.

The diagnosis that triggered this silence is in The Wrong Operating System. The slow work of self-acceptance that ran in parallel is in The Demon Marks Were Always Mine. And the books I came back to when the reading became possible again are in I Didn’t Read Any Autism Books After My Diagnosis.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 17, 2026

autism diagnosis grief, autistic burnout, body processing grief autism, Identity and Burnout, late autism diagnosis, late-diagnosed women, post diagnosis depression, post-diagnosis
I Didn’t Read Any Autism Books After My Diagnosis: What I Reached for Instead

I didn’t read any autism books after my diagnosis.

I know that’s not what you’d expect. You’d expect me to say I devoured everything — the memoirs, the clinical guides, the what now handbooks. I did that too, in a way. Just not after. Before the diagnosis — when the question was still what am I — I consumed everything I could find. Podcasts, videos, research papers, late-night threads. It felt like detective work. I was looking for voices that echoed my own, trying to locate myself in other people’s language.

But once the word was official — written down, dated, handed to me in a document — I stopped. I think it’s because the question changed. It was no longer what am I. It was how do I live now, knowing what I know. No autism book could answer that.

I was diagnosed autistic in my late thirties. Autism and giftedness, both — a combination that kept me functional enough to go unnoticed, and struggling enough to never understand why.

In the months after, I ran. Literally — excessively, compulsively, almost daily. It was the only thing that quietened my body enough to survive the noise in my head. I couldn’t read. I couldn’t sit still long enough to process a paragraph. Running became its own language, a way of outpacing what I wasn’t ready to feel. I ran for about four months, on and off — pausing to heal knee pain, pausing again when a toenail fell off, going back anyway. Constantly injured, aching, exhausted, and still lacing up.

Until I couldn’t ignore it anymore. Maybe running wasn’t what my body needed. Maybe I needed to listen to my body, for once. Maybe I needed something less extreme. More grounding, less pounding.

When the running slowed, I started reading again. Not new books, but old ones. I reached for the books I had read during my years in palliative care and oncology — books about meaning, suffering, and what a life is worth when you know it will end. I had read them as a young clinician, sitting beside people who were dying. I had highlighted passages, folded corners, and thought I understood.

I didn’t understand anything. The words were the same. I wasn’t.

Man’s Search for Meaning was the first I picked up again.

Viktor Frankl wrote it from inside a concentration camp, and the argument is deceptively simple: meaning isn’t given. It’s made. It’s shaped in the mind — personal, stubborn, deeply individual. Two people can endure the same suffering and come away with entirely different meanings. The suffering isn’t wasted if you can make something of it. A seed of hope is enough. An ordinary life can be profoundly meaningful — if you decide it is.

The first time I read it, I was thinking about my patients. About suffering from a clinical distance. About how to sit with people at the end of their lives without trying to fix what couldn’t be fixed.

The second time, it was me. Not a concentration camp — nothing that extreme. But forty years of struggling, masking, compensating, burning out, rebuilding, and burning out again. Forty years of not knowing why. And now, at midlife, a few words on a clinical report were supposed to explain everything.

I am trying to make meaning out of it. Out of the diagnosis, out of its timing, out of every decision that led me here. Not because I need the story to be neat — but because the alternative is that it was all for nothing. And I refuse to believe that.

Frankl didn’t make it easier, but he made it possible to sit with.

Edith Eger asked more of me.

I read The Choice and then The Gift back to back. Her message is unflinching: the biggest prison is the one we build in our own minds. We have to face our trauma. Process it. Move through it — not around it. Not bury it. Not pretend it didn’t shape us.

But what stayed with me wasn’t just her message. It was her life. She began studying psychology in her 40s. Earned her PhD at 50. Published her first book at 90. She built something meaningful out of what she survived — not by minimising it, but by refusing to let it be the end of the story.

I started wondering: could I do the same? Not in comparison — the scale of suffering is not the same. But in principle. Could the years of masking, the late diagnosis, the grief of what could have been different — could those lessons become something I offer? I don’t know yet what form that takes, but the question kept coming back to me.

I have two neurodivergent sons. I raised them for years without knowing I was autistic — without knowing they were neurodivergent — carrying a fragile sense of self and a quiet, persistent belief that if you’re struggling this much, something must be fundamentally wrong with you. The diagnosis changed what I could give them. Not perfectly, not instantly. But it gave me language. And I want them to grow up more surefooted than I was. More accepting of themselves. Less haunted by the gap between effort and outcome.

Tuesdays with Morrie was different — simpler, faster, almost disarmingly direct.

Mitch Albom’s conversations with his dying professor don’t circle the question. They land on it. We can leave at any time. We may not grow old. Facing both life and death honestly is one of the bravest things we can do. I return to this one when I need to be shaken awake — when diagnosis feels like something that stole my past and I need someone to hand me back the present. Stop wasting time. Stop drifting through your own life. Be here, on purpose.

Ikigai didn’t resolve anything. I wanted it to. I wanted that clean, elegant answer — the intersection of what I love, what I’m good at, what the world needs, and what I can be paid for.

After diagnosis, I questioned everything. I had spent years pouring into my family. I wanted something that was mine — something that built my sense of self, that contributed, that meant something beyond the walls of this house. I explored the practical options: YouTube, parenting content, selling a product. All of it made sense on paper. None of it felt alive. It felt like working to live, not living to work, and I knew that wouldn’t sustain me.

Ikigai comforted me, but it left the question open. I’m still circling it. What I do know is that my heart kept pulling me back to writing — even when it felt too vulnerable, too exposing. I started this blog before my diagnosis, when it was instinct more than strategy. After the diagnosis, I stopped for six months. I was depressed. I spent all that time processing, grieving, running, watching Planet Earth at midnight because something about the scale of the natural world made my inner world feel less catastrophic.

When I came back, it wasn’t because I had found my purpose. It was because I needed somewhere for all of this to go.

I highlight when I read. Physical books, especially — pressing the highlighter into the page, tracing sentences that feel like they were written for me. Kindle is different. Faster. Less embodied.

Somewhere along the way, I started copying quotes into a calligraphy notebook — a blank Muji book, no lines, no structure, entirely mine to fill. Calligraphy came quietly, and then immediately made sense. The slowness of it. The precision. The way meaning shifts when you write a sentence by hand, at a pace your body can actually feel. It became its own kind of meditation.

I don’t know what it says about me that I processed a late autism diagnosis by sitting alone at a desk, in the quiet hours, copying other people’s words in ink until they felt like my own.

I don’t process out loud — I never have. It happens on the page. I don’t have friends I talk to about this, not in this way. I’m not sure if it’s the nature of the friendships, or me. I’m autistic. How would I know?

What I do know is this: I didn’t choose writing because I had an audience. I chose it because I had no one to tell. The reflections, the sensitivity, the years of inner work — they needed somewhere to go. The blog became that place. Not because I knew anyone would read it, but because the alternative was silence. And I’ve already lived too much of my life that way.

Maybe someone will find this and recognise something. Not just the books, but the feeling.

And that is meaningful enough.

The silence and depression that came right before this reading came back is in The Silence Between Knowing and Writing. The years in palliative care that taught me how to read for meaning are in A Legacy Left Unwritten. And the gifted-and-autistic profile I learned to name only after diagnosis is in The Wrong Operating System.

If you’re curious, I’ve gathered all the books I mentioned here — and a few others that stayed with me — on my bookshelf. Not as a prescription. Just as a place to start, if you’re asking your own version of the same questions.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 13, 2026

autism diagnosis, autistic burnout, books, late autism diagnosis, meaning and purpose, palliative care, writing
The Wrong Operating System: Being Gifted and Autistic Without Knowing It

The report arrived before the Zoom call.

That is how these things are done, apparently. The psychologist sends it ahead so you can read it first. So you are not sitting in front of a screen, watching a stranger’s face, when the words land.

My heart was already going fast. I had been waiting for this for longer than I wanted to admit.

I skimmed. The way you skim when you are afraid of what you might find if you read too carefully.

Moderately gifted.

Then, a few lines down: ASD Level 1.

My throat went dry. My heart — I don’t know how else to describe it — wrung itself out a little. I wanted to laugh and cry at the same time. I sat there with both impulses and let neither of them win.

The laugh, I understand now, was relief. More than a year of cycling through doubt. More than a year of telling myself I was making things up, that I was normal, that I had simply talked myself into something that wasn’t there. And here it was, in a clinical report, in black and white, on a screen in front of me before a Zoom call I had been dreading.

I wasn’t making it up.

I hadn’t known I was gifted. Not in any conscious way. The psychologist did make a comment during the assessment that stayed with me. When I mentioned offhandedly that I wasn’t gifted, just wanted to rule it out, she looked at me with a peculiar expression. I’m not so sure about that, she said. I pretended I didn’t hear it, and couldn’t quite place what she had just said in my mind.

I had spent my whole life being unable to read certain lines. And also being very good at reading others. And never understanding which was which, or why, or what it cost me to perform the latter while the former remained genuinely, permanently, beyond me.

The best way I can describe it: a high-spec processor running on the wrong operating system. The hardware was never the problem. But the system it was asked to run on wasn’t built for it — and nobody knew to ask why it kept freezing, so everyone assumed it was user error.

That is what twice exceptional actually feels like from the inside. Not twice the gift. Twice the friction.

Primary school was easy. Not easy in the way that made anyone take note — just easy, in the private way of a child who finds the work manageable and cannot explain why it stops being manageable later. Secondary school was different. The terrain shifted and I did not have the tools to shift with it. My results fell. Then fell further. I told myself I was lazy. Not hardy enough. Just the sort of person who needed to work twice as hard to achieve what others managed with half the effort.

What I didn’t know — couldn’t have known — was that the psychologist would one day explain it differently. This is what giftedness and autism looks like together. There is the capability to excel, but autism made everything harder.

The national exams. The major exams later on. Both times I far exceeded what I thought I was capable of. Both times I put it down to luck, or effort, or some combination I couldn’t name. Now I understand the name. Now I understand what it cost.

What I could not see — what no one around me could see — was the energy.

I learned to socialise well. This is not a small thing. My work required me to meet strangers and connect deeply within a short period of time. To understand what they needed. To deliver care with warmth and efficiency, to hold people in their most vulnerable moments, to read a room and know when to speak and when to be still. I knew what to say and how to say it. I could make myself do it.

What I did not understand was the cost.

I was always exhausted after work. Always exhausted after social events. Weekends were for recovering from the week. During difficult stretches I took medical leave because I simply could not will myself through the door, and I would lie in the shame of that — wondering how other people showed up day after day without the seams showing the way mine did. I thought I was lazy. I thought I was weak. I thought this was a character flaw and not a structural one.

I did not know that I had been spending energy I didn’t have. That every act of connection, however genuine, was drawing from a reserve that never fully replenished. That my perfectionism — the need to do the thing properly, completely, or not at all — meant I pushed past the signals long after any reasonable system would have stopped. It took physical symptoms to reach me. And when I finally rested, I could not do that simply either. I spent Sundays moping in a way I could not explain, given that I loved my work, genuinely loved it. I steeled myself. I turned up. I told myself the rest would follow.

It usually did. That was the insidious part.

The grief, when it came with the diagnosis, was not for my present self.

It was for the girl before.

The one who had a small rotation of food she would eat and thought it was stubbornness. The one who cried without warning and stood watching her own tears as though from the outside, wondering why am I overreacting again.

I grew up with little and was happy with little. I read the same hand-me-down books over and over. I wore the same few outfits until they fell apart. At recess I ate the same meal every day, a meal I didn’t even like, because I had been taught to order it once and the repetition felt safer than the terror of ordering something new. When I changed schools, I rotated between two food options and told myself it was convenience.

Everything has another name now.

When teenagers went out after school, I turned them down and went home. I told myself I needed to study. I didn’t understand that the real reason was simpler and more true: I had nothing left. Every social event was a withdrawal from an account that was already running low by afternoon. I didn’t lack the desire for connection. I had friends — kind ones, steady ones, who tolerated my particular way of being present without ever asking me to explain it. But I couldn’t fully get in sync with people and I filed that under personality rather than neurology.

Everything makes sense in the new lens. At the time, it all fit a different story.

There is some anger in the grief. I won’t pretend otherwise.

Nobody noticed, in secondary school, that a sudden and dramatic drop in academic performance was not normal. Nobody saw the signs. Nobody offered the help I actually needed, in part because I didn’t know what I needed, in part because I didn’t know there was a name for what I was.

The very capability that helped me function was the reason no one looked closer. My intelligence made the masking convincing. The convincing masking meant the questions were never asked. I survived so well that I became invisible to the people who might have helped — and for a long time, invisible to myself.

But anger is like holding a burning coal while pointing at the enemy. You let go quickly, or you are the only one who gets burned.

My eldest son is twice exceptional too.

He and I present very differently. His ADHD traits are more visible. He is more asynchronous in the ways that are harder to miss. I look at him and I do not see a mirror, exactly — but I see something more layered than coincidence.

What my diagnosis gave me, among other things, was a language for my son’s experience that I would not otherwise have had. I know what it costs to be him in rooms that were not built for him. I know the particular weight of having a brain that works harder than anyone can see, toward results that look ordinary from the outside.

There is guilt in knowing this came from me, or partly from me. I have sat with that guilt. I won’t pretend I have finished sitting with it. But guilt that fixes nothing is just self-punishment in a more acceptable costume.

What I want for him — what I am trying, imperfectly, to give him — is the thing nobody gave me. An early language. A map drawn by someone who has already walked the terrain. The knowledge that his gifts are real and his struggles are real and neither one cancels the other out.

He has the advantage of knowing early. That is not a small thing. That might be everything.

I am not on the other side of this. I want to be honest about that.

Some days rebuilding feels like progress. Other days it feels like walking in fog and trusting the ground is still there. I started this blog not entirely sure I was capable of it, and I am still not entirely sure. Is my writing good enough. Will anyone care. Is this some kind of gifted-autistic delusion about my own significance. I have no clean answer to any of them.

For most of my life I looked at the places I was failing and tried to fix them. I poured everything into the gaps and kept forgetting there were things I was genuinely good at. I had been too busy climbing out of my ditches to register that I had any higher ground.

I was trying to fit a mould I was never made for.

There is a question that comes after a late diagnosis that nobody warns you about. Not what do I do now — but who am I, underneath all of it.

Forty years of coping mechanisms. Forty years of reading rooms, managing energy, building systems, showing up in the ways that were required. The diagnosis dismantles the story you told about why you did all that. And for a moment — sometimes for longer than a moment — you wonder what is left when the performance stops.

I’ve sat with that question. And I’ve come to something that isn’t quite an answer but feels more honest than one: the mask is also me. The coping mechanisms are also me. The systems I built to survive — the alarms, the reminders, the careful routines, the minimalism that keeps my environment from overwhelming me — these are not separate from who I am. They are evidence of someone who figured out, without a map, how to keep going. I don’t need to shed them to become authentic. I need to understand them. To hold them with curiosity rather than shame.

I am a work in progress. We all are. That is not a consolation. It is simply the truth of being human, and being human is what I am, autism and giftedness and all of its strange, exhausting, occasionally brilliant complexity.

What I have now that I did not have before is words.

I have words for why I don’t use Facebook, why I am drawn to empty surfaces and quiet rooms, why I set five alarms instead of one, why I have built elaborate systems to keep on top of a life that would otherwise overwhelm me. I understand why showing up costs what it costs — and I have stopped punishing myself for the cost. When I do show up now, I show up fully. Present, connected, genuinely there. Not because the exhaustion is gone but because I know now how to protect the energy that makes that possible.

I try not to beat myself up so much. I have more self-awareness about how to manage myself. I am learning, slowly, to strike a balance between what the world asks of me and what I actually have to give.

That is not a cure. It is not a resolution. It is something quieter and more durable than either.

It is finally knowing where I stand.

If you are reading this with a report in your hands — your own, or someone you love — I don’t want to tell you it gets easier, because I don’t know yet if that’s true in the way the phrase usually means.

What I want to tell you is this: the fog is accurate. It is the right response to information that changes everything and nothing at once. You will need time to let the new lens settle. You will grieve things that deserved grieving a long time ago. You will also find, eventually, that certain things in your past that felt like evidence against you are actually evidence of someone who was doing something extraordinary without knowing it.

You were navigating without a map.

Now you have one. It is incomplete and still being drawn. But it is yours, and it is real, and it was always real — you were simply the last one to be told.

The assessment that came before this realisation is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism. The silence and depression that came right after sits in The Silence Between Knowing and Writing. And the books I returned to, when reading became possible again, are in I Didn’t Read Any Autism Books After My Diagnosis.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 7, 2026

autism masking, autistic burnout, autistic identity, gifted and autistic, late autism diagnosis, neurodivergent identity, twice exceptional, twice exceptional adult, writing
I Went In Expecting an ADHD Diagnosis. I Came Out With Autism: A Late Diagnosis Story

I was lying on the floor of my bedroom when it happened.

I don’t know why I was on the floor. I think I was just tired. The kind of tired that bypasses the bed and stops wherever gravity wins. A song came on — one I used to love — and I wasn’t really listening until I was. I’m a words person. I always have been. I don’t follow a melody so much as I follow language, and these words found me in a way that felt unreasonably specific.

When it is time to ask for directions, I should not pretend to play it cool.

I started crying. Not the polite, controllable kind.

I had been circling something for almost a year at that point. My son’s psychologist had planted the seed quietly, in the way careful clinicians do — a suggestion, not a conclusion. She had been noticing things in him, and she had said, gently, that some of what she saw had a way of running in families. She said the word ADHD. I cried then too.

I told myself I was overreacting. I was middle-aged. I was functioning. Whatever this was, it had not stopped me from building a life, raising children, working in a field that required careful attention to other people. I kept asking myself: does it matter now? Whether finding a name for it would make any real difference.

But the question kept coming back. And lying on that floor, I understood that the question was not going to leave me alone until I answered it.

Why ADHD Made Sense

I had been reading everything I could find about my son. The way neurodivergence tends to travel through families, the way parents often recognise themselves in the research. I started drawing parallels, then talking myself out of them. My story wasn’t as obvious as the ones I was reading. I didn’t fit the picture cleanly enough.

But there were things I couldn’t entirely explain away.

The procrastination. The difficulty sustaining focus. The disorganisation that required constant, deliberate management just to stay on top of ordinary life. I had built an entire system around myself — minimalism, intentional living, Google Calendar, lists upon lists, alarms for things most people simply remember. I had assumed this was just discipline. Good habits. I had not considered that the scaffolding itself might be evidence of something.

And then there was secondary school. I had gone from straight As to failing subjects, from a high-achiever to a student eating alone and spending every free period studying, still falling behind. I was in one of the top schools in the country. I wasn’t stupid. But something had stopped working, and I had spent decades attributing it to a failure of character — not enough resilience, not enough grit, not the right attitude.

The psychologist had told me that my son was highly masking. That his compensatory skills were holding, but probably only until the academic and social demands of secondary school exceeded his capacity to manage them. That when the masking fell short, he would likely cross the threshold.

I had crossed a threshold too. At roughly the same age. I just hadn’t known what to call it.

A Year of Going Back and Forth

Between that floor and the actual assessment, there was about half a year.

I would read something and feel certain. I would talk myself back down. I would read something else. The more I thought about it, the more real it felt — but that itself became part of the doubt. The more you think about something, the more it feels true. Was I researching my way into a diagnosis? Making a mountain out of a molehill, the way I had always accused myself of doing? Another example of overthinking, confirmation bias, catastrophising.

There had also been the burnouts. Several of them, over the years, each one explained away at the time.

The first came early in my career. I had gone into the work wanting simply to be a good clinician. What I encountered instead was the texture of office life — the politics, the social currents running beneath every interaction, all of it exhausting in ways I couldn’t articulate. I took three months of no-pay leave. Then I quit. What I remember most from that period is a particular flatness. Not sadness exactly, but a grey meaninglessness. A quiet and corrosive question about whether any of it was worth it. Whether I was built for this world at all.

The ones that followed were different in shape but familiar in texture. Postnatal exhaustion that went beyond what I could attribute to new motherhood. A period during Covid that brought anxiety and a kind of hypervigilance I didn’t recognise in myself at the time. And then the years we spent abroad — homeschooling, parenting two young children far from home, trying to hold too many things at once — then I started running evening fevers. I went for blood tests. Everything came back clean. Stress-related, I concluded. Which is another way of saying: something here is not sustainable.

Each time, I had a reasonable explanation. Office politics. New baby. Pandemic. Relocation. None of the explanations were wrong. They just didn’t account for why the recovery always took so long, or why the same pattern kept returning no matter how carefully I restructured my life.

That was what I kept coming back to during that year of circling. Not any single episode, but the repetition of them. The fact that I had been here before, and before that, and before that.

I finally decided to get assessed.

The Assessment Itself

It happened across a few sessions — an interview, two formal assessments covering autism and ADHD, and the WAIS for cognitive function. There were questionnaires I filled in myself, and a third-party questionnaire my partner completed separately.

I want to say something about what it actually feels like to go through this process as an adult, because I don’t think it gets talked about honestly enough.

I couldn’t sleep properly. I couldn’t eat. I spent the nights before each session running back through my own history, cataloguing symptoms, trying to make sure I wasn’t leaving anything out. I was terrified of two things simultaneously: that I would present too well, mask without meaning to, and come out the other end with nothing. And that I would discover I had, in fact, been imagining all of it.

The psychologist was experienced and warm and careful. That helped. What didn’t change was the vulnerability of the thing — sitting across from someone and being asked to be completely, unflinchingly honest about the parts of yourself you’ve spent a lifetime quietly managing. I have never been so unguarded with another person.

I still don’t entirely know where I found the courage.

The Results

The results came over a video call. I had chosen that deliberately. Going in person would have been harder, more confronting. I needed the small buffer of a screen.

Somewhere in my gut, I had suspected all three were possible. But I had ranked them in terms of likelihood: ADHD most probable, giftedness not impossible, autism almost certainly not.

I was wrong about the last one.

When autism came up, I stayed calm. I told myself I was accepting it. I wasn’t. What I was doing was processing it in layers, the way shock sometimes works — the first layer holds, and then the ones beneath it start to give way.

Because here is the part that made me laugh, softly, in the way you laugh at things that are also painful.

I am an occupational therapist. I have worked with people navigating illness, loss, the unwinding of everything they thought their life would be. I know what autism is. I am not a paediatric OT, but I know enough. I had spent years watching my eldest son struggle — the intensity, the asynchrony, the way the world seemed to land on him differently — and it had taken me years to get him to a formal diagnosis. Years during which I had already been quietly blaming myself for not seeing it sooner, not moving faster, not knowing what I should have known.

And then to find it in myself.

It was almost laughable. Almost.

The denial that followed was not loud. It was more like a quiet, persistent argument I kept having with myself. I have sensory issues with food, yes — but I had always explained that away. I was low energy — but who isn’t. Small social circle — but that’s introversion, surely, not something clinical. I had justifications for all of it, built over decades, and they were not unreasonable justifications. That was the difficulty. They weren’t wrong, exactly. They were just incomplete.

And I thought I had a sense of humour. A sharp one. I could be sarcastic. I thought I could read a room. Surely that excluded me from the category, or maybe not?

It took time to understand that these things are not contradictions. That autism in an adult woman who has spent thirty-something years learning to compensate does not look like what you see in a textbook.

The Giftedness

The psychologist said it gently — that perhaps the giftedness had masked the autism. That the two together create a particular kind of invisibility. The capability compensates for the gaps so thoroughly that even the person living it cannot see the architecture underneath.

I sat with that for a long time. Giftedness is not simply ability — it carries its own weight, its own particular asynchrony. And when the two were named together, in the same breath, they reframed not just my present but everything behind me.

What followed was not relief so much as a slow, complicated reckoning — the kind that takes months to metabolise.

If you came here because you typed something like I think I have ADHD into a search bar and weren’t sure what you’d find — I see you. That’s exactly where this started for me too.

And if what you find, at the end of your own assessment, turns out to be something you didn’t expect — something bigger, something older, something that reframes years you thought you already understood — I want you to know that the reframing is worth it.

Even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard.

If you’re somewhere in the middle of this journey — wondering whether to get assessed, or sitting with results you’re still making sense of — I’d love to hear where you are. Leave a comment below, or reach out directly.

The assessment process itself, in close detail, is in When You Stop Pretending You Don’t Need Directions. The gifted-and-autistic profile that came back in the report is in The Wrong Operating System. And the longer reckoning with what acceptance actually meant is in The Demon Marks Were Always Mine.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 6, 2026

adhd, autism assessment, autism diagnosis, autistic burnout, gifted and autistic, late autism diagnosis, occupational therapy, writing
The Demon Marks Were Always Mine: What K-Pop Demon Hunters Taught Me About Late Autism Diagnosis and Self-Acceptance

I heard the music before I watched the film.

The songs found me at a strange time. I had just received my diagnosis — autistic, and gifted — and I didn’t know what to do with myself. That is the only way I can describe it. I didn’t know what to do with myself. The results sat on the table. I sat with them. There was nowhere to put any of it.

The lyrics kept replaying in my head. Not as background noise. Something more insistent than that — finding the cracks, circling back, saying the same thing over and over until I was ready to hear it.

I got on the treadmill. I had never been a runner. I am still not, really. But I ran, and I kept running, because my body needed somewhere to put what my mind couldn’t hold. I ran until my knees hurt. I ran until one of my toenails turned black, and eventually fell off. The songs played on repeat and I let them, and somewhere in the running and the looping lyrics and the strange grief of those weeks, something was slowly working itself loose.

I don’t watch shows. I get too absorbed, too wrapped up — the boundary between the story’s emotional world and my own is too thin, and I don’t like the feeling of living inside something I know isn’t real. I have always been this way.

But I had been living inside this music for weeks. So I watched K-Pop Demon Hunters.

Rumi hides her demon marks. There is shame in carrying something the world around her does not understand, and so she covers it, performs around it, becomes so practiced at the covering that it starts to feel like the truth. She knows her marks are there. She has always known. The hiding is a choice — exhausting, necessary, deliberate.

I recognised something in that. And then I noticed the difference.

Rumi knew her marks were there. I didn’t. I had spent nearly forty years not knowing I had them — not hiding them, not managing them, not choosing to cover them up. Simply not knowing they existed. The exhaustion I carried, the burnout that kept returning, the particular cost of ordinary things — I had attributed all of it to character flaws I couldn’t seem to fix. Not to marks. Not to something that had a name.

What I want to write about here is what happened once I knew.

Because knowing is not the same as accepting. That part surprised me.

When the diagnosis landed, my first instinct was not recognition. It was resistance. A quiet, persistent argument I kept having with myself. These aren’t scars. I’m not a demon. I thought of the ways I didn’t fit the picture I held in my mind — the sense of humour, the sarcasm, the ability to read a room on a good day. I thought of all the ways I had managed, compensated, held it together. Surely that disqualified me. Surely all of that counted for something.

There is something particular about the blindness of it that I keep returning to. I am an occupational therapist. I knew what autism was. I had spent years navigating my son’s diagnosis before it finally pointed back at me. And still — you can understand a thing completely and still not see it in yourself. The psychologist suggested, gently, that the giftedness had likely masked the autism for decades. That the two together create a particular kind of invisibility: the capability compensating for the gaps so thoroughly that even the person living it cannot find the architecture underneath.

Rumi knew her marks and hid them. I hadn’t known mine long enough to decide what to do with them. But I was starting to feel the same pull she felt — the temptation to keep explaining them away, keep covering, keep arguing that they weren’t really there.

And somewhere underneath that argument, I already knew it wasn’t going to hold.

The question that kept surfacing was a quiet one.

Why did I not realise this earlier?

I thought about all the years of pushing through. The burnout that kept returning no matter how carefully I tried to live. The way I always assumed the problem was my attitude, my discipline, my failure to manage what everyone else seemed to manage. I kept telling myself that all of us struggle, that no one leads a perfect life, that suffering is just part of being human. I wasn’t wrong about that. But I was missing something.

I didn’t know that not everyone struggled in the same way. That what felt like swimming upstream for me was, for others, simply swimming. That the extra cost I paid for every ordinary thing was not a tax everyone paid.

I just didn’t know. And not knowing meant I was never gentle with myself about it.

What I felt was not I wish I were different. It was softer and more specific than that.

It was the sadness of looking back at a life of effort and finally understanding its shape. All that time. All those years of pushing and burning out and pushing again. The quiet shame of feeling perpetually behind — not the shame of hiding something, but the older, more corrosive kind. The shame of not understanding why everything cost so much, and turning that unknowing, year after year, into a verdict about your own adequacy.

I didn’t know. And now I do. And knowing changes how I carry it.

What I wish is not that I were different. What I wish is that I had known earlier — so I could have helped myself. So I could have given myself so much more grace.

I want to be honest about where I am, because I think the version of acceptance you sometimes read about — the triumphant, fully-arrived kind — is not where most people actually live.

I am not proud of my marks. Not yet. I’m not ready to show them off. Part of me still wishes they weren’t there — and I think that’s allowed. Grief doesn’t resolve on a schedule, and this is a grief, even if it’s also something else.

But I’ve stopped trying to rub them off.

That’s the most honest way I can put it. I’m not trying to convince myself I don’t have them anymore. I’m not building new arguments to explain them away. I am, slowly, figuring out how to live with them — how to put on clothes that fit the body I actually have, rather than the one I kept assuming I should have. It’s not acceptance in the shining, complete sense. It’s something more ordinary and more sustainable than that. It’s just — not fighting it anymore.

But here is the thing I keep coming back to, when I sit quietly with it.

The marks make me, me.

If I didn’t have them — if I could somehow extract the autism, the giftedness, the asynchrony, the particular way the world lands on me — I don’t know who would be left. The sensitivity I carried through oncology and palliative care, the ability to sit in silence without rushing to fill it, the way I notice the small things — the tremble of a hand, the tone of a voice — these didn’t come from nowhere. They are not separate from the rest of it. They are the rest of it.

So do I really want to be different? Non-autistic, not gifted? Who would I be then?

It’s a rhetorical question. I know that. And it’s probably not useful to spend too long in it. But I’ve found that sitting with it, briefly, changes something. Because the honest answer is: I don’t know. And the not-knowing loosens the grip of the wish.

There is beauty in broken things. There is a Japanese tradition — kintsugi — of repairing cracked pottery with gold, filling the fractures instead of hiding them. The idea is not that the breaking never happened. It’s that the breaking is part of the object’s history, and that history is worth keeping.

I am not made of pottery. But I understand what it means to stop trying to make the cracks invisible.

We are not alone in this — those of us finding our marks late, sitting with a name we didn’t ask for, trying to figure out what comes next. There are many of us, out there, with our battle scars and our slow reckonings. We can’t turn back time. We can’t un-break the thing. And even if we could, something would be lost.

This is what it is. This is what it sounds like.

In the end, Rumi doesn’t hide. And she doesn’t make a performance of revealing either. She just — stops concealing. She lets the marks exist in the same space as everything else she is.

I’m not there yet. But I’m getting there.

Let the jagged edges meet the light. Let the darkness and the brightness exist in the same frame. Not resolved. Not explained. Just held, together, in the same life.

The toenail grew back.

Slowly, so did I.

Songs referenced: Golden and This Is What It Sounds Like, from the K-Pop Demon Hunters soundtrack.

The full diagnosis story — the year of circling, the assessment, the results I didn’t see coming — is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism. The gifted-and-autistic profile that came back in the report is in The Wrong Operating System. And the reading I returned to after, when reading became possible again, is in I Didn’t Read Any Autism Books After My Diagnosis.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 6, 2026

autism diagnosis, autism masking, autistic burnout, late autism diagnosis, late diagnosis grief, neurodivergent identity, self-acceptance, writing
Why I Called It “Grow with Their Flow” — A Late-Diagnosed Autistic Mother’s Origin Story

The name has outlasted everything I built around it.

It outlasted the burnout, the relocation, the depression that followed my diagnosis. It is still here — quieter now, and truer — which perhaps tells you something about the kind of name it is.

I came up with it when we were living overseas, homeschooling both boys away from home.

I was homeschooling alone, without the familiar rhythms of home or the support of people who knew us. It was one of the hardest periods of my life — though I didn’t fully understand that at the time, because when you are in survival mode you don’t always have the clarity to name it. You just keep going.

The name came to me slowly during that period. Not in a single moment of clarity, but the way most true things arrive — quietly accumulating until one day it simply settled.

Grow with their flow.

What I meant by it then was something practical. I was learning, in real time and often the hard way, that I could not teach my boys the way I had been taught. My eldest moved through the world in his own particular way — hyperfocused on what captivated him, resistant to everything else, intensity arriving without warning over things that seemed small but never were. The conventional approach did not work. What worked was watching him. Following his lead. Growing alongside him rather than ahead of him.

I couldn’t force them into the mold I wanted. I was learning to grow with their flow instead.

Homeschooling two children alone, with no help and nothing spare, eventually left me with nothing left to give. We moved back home. I carried the name with me, still not quite sure what to do with it.

Then came the kitchen floor.

My younger son was in the middle of a meltdown. I don’t remember now what started it — something small, as it often is, because for him the small things carry the weight of everything accumulated before them.

What I remember is that I stopped trying to fix it.

And I sat down on the kitchen floor next to him and I cried.

Not the controlled, composed tears of a mother who has it together. Real crying — the kind that comes from overwhelm and helplessness and the particular grief of feeling like you are failing the person you love most. We sat there together, both of us undone, on the kitchen floor. Him in his storm. Me in mine.

I don’t know how long we were there.

What I know is that something shifted in that moment. Not dramatically. Quietly, the way a door opens.

I had been fighting his flow. Trying to redirect it, contain it, bring it to an orderly end. And the fighting had been exhausting both of us. It was only when I stopped — when I had nothing left with which to fight — that I finally just sat beside him. Not as the mother who knew what to do. As a person who was also overwhelmed, also lost, also just trying to get through.

That day, without intending to, I stopped trying to mold him into something easier to manage.

And I started, for the first time, to simply be with him as he was.

When I stopped trying to force them into a shape they were never meant to take, what I felt first was relief.

And then, almost immediately, guilt.

Relief because the constant recalibrating was over. The measuring of my children against a standard that was never made for them. Relief because I could finally see them properly, without the distortion of who I needed them to become.

Guilt because of how long it had taken. Because of all the times I had communicated — however gently, however well-intentioned — that who they were was not quite enough. That their way of moving through the world was the problem to be solved.

I am still sitting with that guilt. I suspect I will be for some time.

Then I received a report.

It told me something I had half-suspected and spent even longer not quite believing: that I am autistic. Gifted, and autistic. Twice exceptional — the same profile as my eldest, which perhaps explains why I have always understood him so completely, even in the moments I was failing him.

I read it and felt the floor shift.

Not because it told me something new about who I was. But because it gave a name to everything I had always been — the child who cried before school every morning, who rehearsed food orders before placing them, who sat with dying patients for a decade and felt everything they felt and brought it home in her body every night. All of it, finally, made sense.

I had spent the better part of my life trying to grow into a shape that was never mine.

The same way I had been asking my sons to.

The name I had chosen years earlier, in a foreign country, exhausted and barely holding things together — I had thought it was about them.

I understand now that it was always about me too.

This is what grow with their flow means to me now, standing on the other side of that diagnosis.

It means I cannot force my children into the mold I imagined for them — not because I failed as a mother, but because the mold was wrong. They are not broken versions of who they should be. They are exactly who they are, moving at the pace and in the direction that belongs to them. My job is not to redirect that. My job is to walk alongside it. To learn from it. To let it show me things I would not have seen from any other vantage point.

And I am not a broken version of who I should have been, either.

We are all three of us on this path together. None of us ahead of the others. All of us, still, growing.

This blog is not a place where I tell you what I have figured out. It is a place where I show you what I am still figuring out — in real time, without the pretense that I have arrived anywhere yet.

I am an occupational therapist by training. I spent a decade in oncology and palliative care, in rooms where the question of what matters most was never abstract. I am a late-diagnosed autistic woman. I am the mother of two neurodivergent boys who are teaching me, daily, that the most important kind of growing is not the kind that moves you forward.

It is the kind that moves you inward.

The name outlasted everything I built around it. Maybe now, finally, it has found the right home.

Writing here became the only place I could say what I needed to say.

Come grow with me.

If you are parenting a child whose wiring the world doesn’t always make room for — or if you have received your own late diagnosis and are trying to make sense of a life reread from the beginning — you are in the right place. I am glad you found your way here.

The threshold of recognising my own neurodivergence through my child is in When You Start Wondering About Yourself. The moment my parenting changed shape entirely is in The Moment It Clicked. And the diagnosis story that came at the end of that long inquiry is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

April 2, 2026

autistic mother, Identity and Burnout, late autism diagnosis, neurodivergent, neurodivergent parenting, writing
When You Stop Pretending You Don’t Need Directions: What an Adult Autism and ADHD Assessment Actually Feels Like

A personal account of the decision, the process, and what shifts before you even get your results — for anyone who is thinking about going in, or has just come out.

The browser tab had been open for weeks.

I had found the psychologist through research. That is probably an understatement. I watched her talks, read her articles, looked at her credentials, her approach, the way she spoke. I shortlisted a few names, then eliminated them one by one — this one didn’t feel right, that one I couldn’t warm to — until one name remained. It was a feeling, in the end.

Still, I didn’t book.

Then a song came on — one I’d loved for years, with a line about asking for directions when you don’t know the way. About not pretending to be cool. Something in it reached into whatever I had been holding shut, and all the tension I had been carrying came pouring out.

I finally sent the booking form. I kept it brief. Clinical, even. I am considering an assessment, what are the costs and available dates. Not: I have been going in circles for months and I don’t know who I am anymore.

Pressing send felt rash. It also felt final. After all the back and forth — am I imagining this, is this a waste of money, what if nothing shows up — I had started. There was no more deliberating, because there was no more going back.

The wait for the first appointment was two months.

Before the intake session

They told me I didn’t need to prepare for the intake session. It was just a conversation — background information, the psychologist getting a sense of whether to proceed with formal testing and what to include. I did not need to bring anything.

I prepared anyway.

I put together a summary document: everything I thought was relevant, formatted and organised like a neuropsychological report. School certificates. Teacher testimonials I hadn’t looked at in years. Records of things I had explained away or forgotten or never thought to connect.

The hardest part was the childhood history.

Adult assessments rely heavily on it — developmental milestones, early behaviours, how you were as a child before you learned to compensate. I didn’t want to involve my parents. My memory has always been poor for details, and what I did remember I had spent years explaining away — anxious, pessimistic, easily stressed. Those were the words that had followed me. Not autistic. Never that.

So I sat down and wrote. That is how I process things — I pour it out and the shape of it becomes clearer. The more I wrote, the more I found. Memories I hadn’t visited in years surfaced slowly. I began to see that what I had always thought were ADHD traits — the scattered feeling, the difficulty sustaining, the sense of always catching up — had grown more prominent as I got older. But underneath them, earlier, were things that looked different. The food rigidity. The crying before school without being able to explain why. The recess spent alone not because I had no friends but because the canteen was too much. I had not seen any of it as autistic at the time. I just thought I was a certain kind of difficult.

Writing it down did not give me a diagnosis. But it gave me back a girl I had almost completely misread.

Going back through all of it confirmed what I already half-knew, but some of the it were worse than I remembered. I felt a pang of heartache for the girl who had been struggling back then. I wanted to reach back and give her a hug.

When I arrived for the intake session, I didn’t hand the summary over. I was afraid of being seen as too extra — too much. I sat across from her and answered her questions and left the folder in my bag. I have spent my life moderating myself, my feelings, my thoughts. Friends have told me I give the impression of being calm and zen. Little did they know.

After much deliberation, I sent the document by email instead. I thought: it’s already done, and I want the most complete assessment possible. At worst, she could ignore it. Maybe the sending of it was data too.

The intake session is the first formal step — a clinical interview where the psychologist gathers your background and history, gets a sense of your concerns, and decides what to assess and how. She recommended proceeding with both autism and ADHD assessments. The IQ component was optional. My husband suggested I do the complete package, for a fuller picture of my cognitive profile. At that point I didn’t think I was gifted. I mostly wanted to know why some things had always been so hard, and I thought a complete test would give me a better picture of my strengths, weaknesses, the shape of how my mind actually works.

That first session is also, I came to understand, about something else entirely. It is as much for you to assess the clinician as the other way around.

I knew this because of my son’s assessment. The psychologist who saw him was competent. I just never quite felt seen by her. Information came in pieces. When I had gaps in my understanding, I was afraid to push too hard. I went home and read research papers by myself and came back with more questions and worried the whole time about being difficult. A good clinician and a good fit are not the same thing. For an assessment to be accurate, you need to feel safe enough to be vulnerable — to show who you actually are, not the version of yourself you have spent years curating.

If you don’t feel that with the first person you meet, it is worth finding someone else.

The questionnaires

She handed me questionnaires during the session and sent others by email. Some I filled in myself. Others my husband completed as an informant — someone who knows you outside a clinical setting, who can describe how you function in daily life from the outside rather than the inside.

I didn’t ask him what he had written. I knew he knew me well enough, and I knew he accepted me as I am. That, more than anything, was what I needed to believe sitting across from her — that his account of me would be honest rather than protective. The gap between how I experience myself and how I appear to someone who lives with me turned out to be more significant than I expected. What looks like coping, from the outside, often is. What it costs is less visible.

The scales covered different ground. The Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale looked at attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity — how I manage focus, how I lose it, whether the difficulty is situational or constant. The Social Responsiveness Scale mapped social awareness and communication, including how much effort social interaction actually costs. The Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire — the CAT-Q — was designed specifically for people who may have learned to hide their autistic traits so effectively that standard tools miss them. It asks not just what you do, but what you are working to conceal. The Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function looked at planning, working memory, emotional regulation — the day-to-day business of running a life.

I completed all of them with the same feeling: that I was trying to describe something in a language that didn’t quite have the right words. The honest answer to almost every item was it depends — on how much sleep I’d had, whether I trusted the person across from me, whether I’d already spent my reserves on being fine before I arrived. The format doesn’t have room for that. It asks you to collapse something layered and lifelong into a single word.

I wanted to annotate every answer. The psychologist said I could. I did.

The formal assessment

The formal assessment happened over two days.

I didn’t sleep well the night before. I couldn’t eat in the morning. I arrived at the clinic with a pounding headache and asked the receptionist for paracetamol before we started — I was genuinely worried about not being able to think clearly.

When I sat down, I told the psychologist: I don’t perform well under pressure. I’m anxious. I’m not at my best today.

At the time it felt like damage control. Looking back, it was the most honest thing I could have done.

The first day was IQ testing — the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, which measures cognitive ability across several areas: verbal reasoning, perceptual reasoning, working memory, processing speed. It is structured, timed, unforgiving in its format. The working memory tasks were the hardest. Some of what was read to me didn’t register by the time I was supposed to respond. There was a moment where I genuinely couldn’t tell if I hadn’t heard it, or hadn’t processed it, or had simply gone somewhere else without meaning to. I sat there and could not answer the question. I felt, leaving that first day, that the headache had cost me something.

The second day brought the Conners Continuous Performance Test — a computerised attention task that measures how consistently you can sustain focus over time, how quickly your responses slow or become erratic. It does not ask you anything. It simply watches how your attention moves when you think no one is looking. I felt I had made too many errors and was disappointed.

The ADOS-2 was different from everything else. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule is a structured clinical observation — the psychologist presents specific activities and conversations designed to draw out the kinds of responses relevant to autism. It is less a test and more a careful watching. I knew she was looking at how I communicated, how I navigated social exchange, how I responded to ambiguity. Some of the tasks were strange, and she had warned me they would be — miming brushing my teeth, being handed unrelated objects and asked to build a story, working through a wordless picture book that made no obvious sense. It felt odd, even childish. I did it anyway. I understood, on some level, what each task was reaching for, even when I couldn’t fully name it.

I told myself, going in, not to mask. As a deliberate instruction. I spoke more than I normally would. I asked for coffee mid-session because I needed it — which sounds small, but for someone who has spent years calculating whether a request will make her seem like too much, it wasn’t. When I was anxious, I said so. When something didn’t make sense, I said that too.

There was another fear underneath that one, quieter but persistent. What if I was too good at this? What if I had spent so long learning to appear fine that even here, in a room designed to look past the appearance, I would just look fine?

It is a fear many late-diagnosed women carry into that room. The tools used in adult autism assessment were built largely around male presentations — more visible, more behavioural, less concealed. The smarter and more verbal you are, the easier it is to compensate in the moment, to find your way through a task even when the effort costs something. A good clinician knows this. The CAT-Q exists precisely because standard tools can miss people who have spent a lifetime hiding.

What I decided, sitting across from her, was to do my part. I told her to reach out if she needed more information or clarification. I had already sent the summary. I had written into the questionnaires. I had said, when I was anxious, that I was anxious. What I could not do was unmask something I couldn’t always see in myself. That part I had to trust her with.

I still don’t know how much I masked without realising. That is the part that unsettles me. I have been doing it so long that I cannot always see it from inside. The assessment was measuring, in part, a behaviour I may have been performing even while trying to stop.

There were also tears that came during the clinical interview.

She asked about fear. What I was afraid of. And I told her: not living a good enough life, by my own standards. Not a meaningful one. Falling short as a mother, as a person. Reaching the end of something and feeling I had not done enough with what I had.

These are things I think about in quiet moments. To say them out loud was something else entirely. There they were, out in the open, no longer just thoughts I could push aside. I had named them in front of someone else, and now they were real.

I hated crying in front of her. I hate crying in front of anyone. There is a particular shame in it — the feeling of being caught — that I have never been able to fully explain. But I noticed something underneath the embarrassment. Everything I named as a fear was entirely internal. Nothing about what other people thought of me. Everything about whether I was living up to something I couldn’t quite name.

I held onto that on the way home. I had no more space to think about it then. But I didn’t let it go.

That evening, I didn’t think about it.

I noticed that later, with some surprise. Two days of being fully present to my own history, and then a kind of blankness. I couldn’t have processed any more even if I had tried. I ate something. I went to bed. The questions that had been running on a loop for months had gone quiet — not because they were answered, but because there was nothing left to do.

Before I had walked into that room, what I feared most was a negative result. Results that showed nothing, confirmed nothing, left me with the same unanswered question I had been carrying for years. But somewhere during the two days, that fear had shifted. My gut had settled into something closer to certainty.

And I also knew, for the first time, that even if I was wrong — even if nothing showed up — the process itself had already given me something. The memories I had written into that summary. The patterns I had finally let myself see. The understanding that my experiences were real, that my pain was real, that I had not been imagining any of it. That was already mine, regardless of what the report would say.

I walked out into the corridor, headed to the washroom directly and closed the door behind me. I stood there for a moment.

Heavier and lighter at the same time. Heavier because somewhere deep in my gut, I already knew. Lighter because some weight had lifted — I had started, I was closer, I had let someone see what I had been carrying.

I didn’t have results yet. But two days of being really asked about myself — and really answering — had already shifted something.

The results were two weeks away. That waiting is its own experience, and I’ve written about it separately. But walking out of that room, I was already different from the person who had pressed send on a booking form months before, still not sure she had the right to be there.

It turns out you don’t need to be sure. You just need to go.

The two-week wait that followed is in Sitting with the Unknown. The diagnosis itself — when an ADHD assessment turned into an autism one — is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism. And the gifted-and-autistic profile that came back in the report is in The Wrong Operating System.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

September 3, 2025

autism assessment, autism diagnosis, autism masking, autistic burnout, late autism diagnosis, mental-health, occupational therapy, unmasking, writing
Sitting with the Unknown — The Emotional Limbo After an Autism and ADHD Assessment

I’ve just finished weeks of assessments — IQ testing, autism and ADHD evaluations — and now I find myself in limbo, waiting for the results. Two weeks doesn’t sound long. But when you’ve carried questions about yourself for most of your life, two weeks can feel like standing on a shaky bridge between two shores, unable to move forward.

The waiting is not silent.

The thoughts keep circling, the same ones on rotation: What if nothing shows up and it was just all my overthinking? What if I’m not autistic, not ADHD — just flawed? What if I wasted all that money for nothing?

That last one stings the most. The financial cost of these assessments is significant, and sometimes I wonder if I’ve been foolish. But I keep coming back to this: whatever the report says, something has already shifted. The assessment process itself has been a mirror. It pulled up layers of myself I didn’t know I had buried. I have already gained something from that, even if I cannot name it cleanly yet.

What the process surfaced, more than anything, were the old explanations.

Maybe I just find adulthood hard because I’m immature. Maybe being an only child slowed me down — I never learned to handle conflict the way other people did.

Those stories worked for years. They gave the struggle a shape I could live with. But they always carried a quiet sting, because they made everything a character flaw — something I needed to try harder to overcome. What I’m beginning to sit with now is a different possibility. Not that I am behind, or immature, or not trying hard enough. But that I am simply different. And that the gap I kept trying to close was never mine to close in the first place.

The assessment itself was more confronting than I expected.

Not just the tests — the talking. Saying things out loud that had only ever lived in my own head. I cried more than I anticipated, and not always over the things I expected to cry about.

At one point I brought up an incident in my career — from a time when I was part of a team working to establish something new, defining boundaries and claiming ground that hadn’t yet been formally mapped. I documented something as falling within our professional scope. A colleague from another discipline had documented it too, and took offence at my framing. It escalated to my senior before I’d had a chance to address it directly.

What I remembered, saying it out loud, was the confusion more than the upset. I had hesitated before documenting it — I’d wondered how it would land, whether it seemed passive aggressive. But I also knew that if I didn’t claim that ground explicitly, it would quietly be absorbed elsewhere, the way it had happened before in other institutions, passing down through generations of practitioners. I did what I believed was right. I didn’t think it needed explaining. And somehow that was the problem.

In the assessment room, saying it out loud, something clarified.

This had happened to me often. Not just that incident — a pattern across years. I could not always tell how what I did or didn’t do would land. I chose what seemed right, and it came off differently than I intended, and I was left confused by the gap between the two. I knew in my heart it wasn’t wrong. I hadn’t thought that needed explaining either. It occurred to me, for the first time, that this might not be a personality flaw or a professional misstep. It might simply be how my brain is wired — operating from a clear internal compass, genuinely unable to predict the social weather around it.

Nobody told me that. The psychologist made her notes and held the space. The realisation came from the saying of it — from hearing my own words outside my head for the first time, in a room where I had permission to be completely honest.

That is what the assessment gave me before any results arrived.

The two weeks that followed were uncomfortable in the way that digesting always is.

I replayed things. What I had said and hadn’t said. What the psychologist had noted. Incidents I’d half-forgotten that had surfaced unexpectedly. It felt like ruminating — the same circling I’d done my whole life — but with a different quality this time. This time the circling was moving toward something rather than simply repeating. Each pass over the same ground left me slightly more certain than before, not about the diagnosis, but about the experiences themselves. That they were real. That they had hurt. That the confusion I had carried for years was not a character weakness dressed up in explainable circumstances.

By the time the two weeks ended I had something I hadn’t walked in with. Not a label. Not answers. A quieter thing — the beginning of being able to sit with all of it. The flaws, the patterns, the incidents I had spent years either explaining away or running from. I had spent so long trying to fix what felt broken, trying to get rid of the problems, that I had never really stopped and said: this is all me. And it is okay.

The report would come. It would say what it said. But the waiting — the uncomfortable, circling, slowly-illuminating waiting — had already done something the report could not undo.

Looking back, I notice how often I dissociated from people when relationships got closer.

Not in a dramatic way. I was never pushed out or ostracised. It was quieter than that. I simply felt that I didn’t quite connect or belong, so I gently drifted away. Sometimes I knew I was doing it. Sometimes it happened without me noticing. Either way, I became an expert at distancing myself before anyone could reject me.

That pattern was surfacing now too, in the space the assessment had opened. The self-doubt. The old ache of not fitting in. The familiar pull toward the edges.

The assessment didn’t create any of it. It just stopped the noise long enough for me to hear it.

I’m not sure what to do with all of it yet. But I am, for the first time in a long time, staying with it instead of running.

For now, I am just trying to stay on the bridge.

The assessment process itself, just before this waiting, is in When You Stop Pretending You Don’t Need Directions. The diagnosis that finally came at the end of the wait is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism. And the five months of silence that followed are in The Silence Between Knowing and Writing.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

September 3, 2025

anxiety, autism assessment, autism diagnosis, autistic burnout, late autism diagnosis, mental-health, writing
The Threads of Life – Growing Up as an Undiagnosed Neurodivergent Woman

A Quietly Intense Beginning

Childhood, for me, was never loud. As an only child, the rhythms of home were quiet and contained. Outside those walls, the world felt bigger, louder, and more unpredictable.

I loved being at home. There was always something to do—TV to watch, songs to listen to, books to read, and crafts to create. Looking back, those were carefree, happy times. I thought the sameness came from not having much, but I was content.

Yet, two struggles quietly followed me through childhood. The first was with food—I was picky and reluctant to eat. All my life, I’ve avoided all seafood except fish, and I only eat pork and chicken. I’ve come to accept this as part of who I am. A part of me remembers being a stubborn child, insisting on my preferences. Another part laughs at the thought—imagine all the money I saved!

The second struggle was with tears. I cried before school, I cried over things said or left unsaid, done or left undone. Often, I didn’t understand why I cried.

Some mornings, I sat at the dining table in my uniform, head bowed, dreading the day ahead. It wasn’t schoolwork I feared—I enjoyed learning and liked my teachers well enough. But stepping out the door felt like a small tearing, a crossing into a place where I had to be “on.” My mother’s gentle encouragement, a touch on my shoulder, was the quiet anchor before I left.

I would board the school bus and will myself not to cry, but the tears came anyway. I would think, Here they come again. And I’d ask myself, Why? Cognitively, I knew I shouldn’t cry, but emotionally, I couldn’t help it—and I couldn’t explain it.

In the classroom, I thrived. I read quickly, wrote easily, and solved problems with ease. Praise arrived like small lights in the day—both encouragement and a reminder to keep up the effort. Beneath those calm moments, I was deeply feeling: the shift in the room when someone was upset, the weight of wanting to do things right. I was proud to make my parents proud, and I knew my good grades brought them joy.

If I think back hard enough, I recall moments when I was completely immersed in whatever I was doing. I remember being called repeatedly for meals and yelling back mindlessly, I’m coming!

I also remember never liking to be out and about. Shopping days felt long and dreary; the adults took forever, and I wasn’t interested. At the time, I thought I was just uninterested, but now I wonder if it was partly sensory—too much noise, light, and movement.

The Shifting Ground

By secondary school, the ground beneath me began to shift. I was in one of the country’s top schools. The lessons grew heavier, and so did my thoughts. Focus no longer came easily. After school, I’d sit at my desk, books open, eyes fixed on the same page as the sun set.

Sometimes, I put off assignments until late at night, writing under the soft glow of my lamp. I wanted to do well, but it was hard. Was I lazy? Was I not smart enough? My pen moved in bursts, driven by a mix of resolve and quiet panic. The ease I once knew had vanished, replaced by stubborn persistence. I learned to push on, even when exhaustion and doubt threatened to overwhelm me.

My body began to protest—gastric pains, irritable bowels, and persistent shoulder aches became constant companions.

Turning Inward

During those years, I slowly retreated from the social swirl around me. It wasn’t sudden, but a gentle pulling toward the edges—recess spent quietly in the classroom, eating my packed lunch, avoiding the noisy canteen. I wished I could blend into the walls.

Small talk felt like a performance. My mind sought deeper questions—ones no one voiced aloud: Why are we here? How do people heal after loss? What gives life meaning?

Before graduation, friends passed around notebooks to write messages. I recently found mine again—page after page filled with words about my kindness and understanding, encouragement to be happier, and advice to look beyond grades. It was an open secret that I struggled academically and felt unhappy. Yet, people saw me as a good friend—someone who listened and understood their fears.

I had forgotten all that. I forgot I had friends and all those moments. What stayed with me were the difficulties—the feeling that school was a hard climb.

If I had to describe my secondary school life, everything felt intense and difficult. The constant theme was feeling “less than.” I believed I had to work harder than others to reach the same goals. I got through the national exams and the major exams later on, telling myself it was hard work and sheer luck. Outwardly, life looked good—I was in top schools and had better-than-average grades—but underneath, I knew everything was harder for me. I sensed a gap I had to fill but didn’t understand why.

Karaoke was a trendy pastime back then. I probably went to three or four outings but never enjoyed them. I didn’t understand what others got from it and stopped joining in, thinking I’d spare them my terrible singing. Hanging out at the McDonald’s near school was another common activity. I joined a few times but felt it was a waste of money on unhealthy food and pointless chats, so I decided it was better to get home to study.

Stepping into Adulthood

Leaving school felt like stepping from a small room into a wide open plain. I carried my familiar traits—sensitivity, determination, a need for quiet—but now I had to navigate without the clear structure of bells and timetables.

University overseas was a mix of freedom and pressure. I studied occupational therapy, a field centered on understanding and helping people. It suited me—the listening, the quiet observation, the problem-solving. I connected with patients even when self-doubt whispered. Yet, my old patterns remained: bursts of deep focus followed by procrastination and late nights catching up.

The Work of Caring

My early career took me into oncology and palliative care—places where life’s fragility is ever present. Here, sensitivity was both gift and burden. I learned to sit with grief, to hold silence without rushing to fill it. I noticed the small things—the tremble of a hand, the tone of a voice when someone spoke of home.

In time, I understood something profound: life often holds no clear answers. I learned that it’s okay not to always know what to say. Sometimes, silence carries more meaning than words. Letting go of the need to solve everything was part of why I was drawn to palliative care—a place where presence mattered more than solutions.

But acceptance came with costs. At times, I swept difficult feelings under the rug. The unanswered questions—the why me and what now—sometimes felt too heavy. Life is messy, uncertain, and rarely neat. I carried this quiet tension: accepting life’s limits while sensing unfinished stories. The struggles I saw others carry — so much larger than my own — reminded me to straighten my shoulders and continue on.

Shifting Roles

Marriage and motherhood turned the page again. The birth of my two sons reshaped my days. The quiet intensity of childhood met the relentless motion of parenting. The mental load was constant—especially after living overseas for two years and homeschooling—and I felt my energy drain, my body strain under stress-related symptoms.

Motherhood also brought its own solitude. Small talk at playgrounds and school gates felt harder than ever. My mind was caught in feeding schedules, sleep patterns, and quiet worries no one spoke aloud. Slowly, my social world shrank to a handful of fragile friendships and the four walls of home.

The sorrow I carried grew heavier. Burnout crept in, layer by layer. Detachment followed as a shield but dulled parts of me that once felt alive.

The Underlying Questions

Through all these changes, some themes persisted. I have always sought meaning—in a patient’s story, a child’s milestone, or the quiet moments in between. My sensitivity remains both anchor and challenge—deepening connection while amplifying overwhelm.

If I look back, I see I avoided many things: food, crowds, going out, even though I worked closely with people. I never really felt I belonged in those spaces.

I was never an outcast and had friends throughout my life. Autism was never on my radar. My sense of being different was mostly that I disliked parties and never went to clubs or concerts. I thought I was just cheap—those things cost money. But now I think maybe it was that I never wanted to pay to be in crowded places with bright lights, loud noises, and overwhelming smells.

A Life Woven from the Same Threads

Looking back, I see my life not as separate chapters but as a continuous thread — the same qualities weaving through every stage. The sensitivity. The persistence. The need for quiet. The search for meaning.

Sometimes strengths. Sometimes burdens. Always present.

These traits were quiet companions I didn’t have name for as a child. As an adult, they are both compass and weight—guiding me toward meaningful work but pulling me toward burnout when I ignore my limits.

In learning to understand these threads, I am learning to understand myself—not as contradictions but as a whole. The child who cried before school and the mother now standing at a new threshold are one person.

Now, all those feelings I once swept away have risen to the surface. I can no longer ignore the weight pressing on my body and spirit. It’s time to unpack these emotions — to face them before my body and spirit give up on me.

The slow decision to seek answers — to take the threads seriously enough to pursue an assessment — is in Is It All in My Head?. The assessment process itself is in When You Stop Pretending You Don’t Need Directions. And the diagnosis that finally named the pattern is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

August 31, 2025

autism masking, autistic women, late autism diagnosis, masking, mental-health, neurodivergent identity, neurodivergent women, unmasking, writing
Is It All in My Head? — Deciding to Get Assessed for Autism and ADHD as an Adult

I never expected to be here—mid life, sitting across from a psychologist, agreeing to a full assessment for ADHD, autism, and an IQ test.

During the session, I kept asking her, “I’m not dreaming all this up, am I? I’m not making a mountain out of a molehill?” A part of me was afraid she’d nod and say, “Yes, you are.” Because for most of my life, that’s what I’ve told myself: You’re overreacting. You’re being dramatic. You just need to try harder.

I’d explain away my struggles as personality quirks. Or tell myself I was just overthinking—as always. Eventually, I even tried to underthink things, to stop analyzing every little detail, to avoid making life feel harder than it already did. So, I brushed things off. Conveniently. Repeatedly.

But now, when I look back—really look back—so many incidents rise to the surface with a bubbling question mark: Maybe? Maybe not? I’ve also started seeing echoes of my own struggles in my children—how they process the world, what overwhelms them, where they shine, and where they stumble. Watching them from the outside has been like holding up a mirror I didn’t know I needed. The patterns I see in them tug at old memories in me, and suddenly it feels like I’m piecing together a puzzle I never even knew existed.

And yet, there’s still a part of me that denies it. Because I’ve always believed that life is hard for everyone, just in different ways. Who am I to think my hard is different? Another part of me feels like I’ve been standing on the platform, watching all the people I grew up with boarding trains to important, significant destinations—building careers, achieving milestones, making their mark—while I’ve been here, quietly chugging along on my own slow carriage, unsure if I’m even on the right track. And all the while, I’ve been finding everything harder than it should be.

When I hesitantly try to sort my lifelong struggles into ADHD or autistic traits… they seem to fit. Almost too neatly. And then I’m back to wondering: Is it all in my head?

Beneath all of this, something is welling up. A steady, persistent knowing that something about my experience of the world has always been… different. That exhaustion after social situations, the intense sensitivity to noise and chaos, the way I can get lost in my thoughts for hours yet struggle to start simple tasks—these aren’t signs of weakness. They’re part of a pattern I never had the language to name.

There’s a bittersweet kind of sadness in finally getting to this point. Not because I regret it—but because I wish I hadn’t had to carry so much confusion for so long. I think about my younger self—earnest, capable, always trying her best, and always wondering why everything felt a little bit harder. I want to tell her she wasn’t lazy or broken or “too much.” She was just unsupported. Undiscovered.

This isn’t about chasing a label. It’s about making sense of my story. It’s about seeing my strengths and struggles together, in full context, for the first time. It’s about giving myself permission to exist as I am, without the constant self-blame.

I still grieve for the years I spent thinking it was all me. For the times I thought I wasn’t “good enough” to show up as myself. For all the energy I poured into masking, when I could have been learning how to thrive.

But alongside that grief, there’s relief. And a cautious hope. Like I’ve finally cracked open a door I didn’t know was there.

In a sense, I always knew I wasn’t meant to be on those fast trains. Something in me understood that my journey was supposed to be different—slower, quieter, winding through paths others might never see. But I didn’t trust myself. I carried too much self-doubt, second-guessing my instincts. I kept looking around, wondering why I wasn’t on the same train as everyone else, even though a part of me already knew I wasn’t built the same.

Now, I’m learning to navigate my own route with a map I didn’t have before. I’m on my way to meeting myself for the first time—fully, without apology.

If you’re here too—wondering, doubting, asking if maybe it’s all in your head—please know this: it’s not just you. And it’s not just in your head. Your experiences are real. Your story matters. And finding the words for it might just be the first step toward finally feeling at home in your own skin.

If you decide to pursue an assessment, the honest account of what that process involves is in When You Stop Pretending You Don’t Need Directions. The two-week wait that follows is in Sitting with the Unknown. And the diagnosis that finally arrived at the end of it is in Expected ADHD, Got Autism.

New essays, delivered as I write them. Quiet, occasional, no noise.

Subscribe

August 5, 2025

autism diagnosis, autism masking, autistic burnout, autistic women, late autism diagnosis, mental-health, writing

Tag: late autism diagnosis

Why ADHD Made Sense

A Year of Going Back and Forth

The Assessment Itself

The Results

The Giftedness

Before the intake session

The questionnaires

The formal assessment